INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

( Online- ISSN 2454 -3195 ) New DOI : 10.32804/RJSET

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 73    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF REGULAR STEEL STRUCTURE WITH CONNECTION FLEXIBILITY

    1 Author(s):  ABHAY THAKUR

Vol -  10, Issue- 2 ,         Page(s) : 115 - 123  (2020 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/RJSET

Abstract

In todays world the construction the of the structures is going at a very rapid rate. To fulfill the demands of the industry we are relying more on the steel structures as they provide more room for access that is more clear distance for the objects to move. Thus, these structure should be designed safely and economically so that there is no obstacle that can hamper the normal production line in coming future.The steel structure are designed on the basis of the Indian standard codes (I.S) Codes.While designing the steel sections we prefer the codes but the codes are silent about the impact of the connections flexibility on the performance of the structure. The code is also silent about the time period values that needs to be taken while designing the structure for the different types of the connections.Thus, in this report we have modelled various steel structure with and without bracing to find out the response of the steel structure under these conditions. The karvasilis approach was followed to find the various parameters of designing the structure and thus the response databank was prepared for the semi rigid, rigid and flexible type of connections. The multiple linear regression analysis were performed on the response databank and the equations for time period and behaviour factor plus other parameters were formed. This helps in designing the structure more economically and safely with the implementation of these new equations.

Chen, C., Ricles, J. M., Karavasilis, T. L., Chae, Y., & Sause, R. 2012. Evaluation of a real-time hybrid simulation system for performance evaluation of structures with rate dependent devices subjected to seismic loading. Engineering Structures, 35, 71-82.
Chen, C., Ricles, J. M., Karavasilis, T. L., Chae, Y., & Sause, R. 2012. Evaluation of a real-time hybrid simulation system for performance evaluation of structures with rate dependent devices subjected to seismic loading. Engineering Structures, 35, 71-8
Cheng, F. Y., Jiang, H., & Lou, K. 2008. Smart structures: innovative systems for seismic response control. CRC Press.
Chiniwalar, B. V., Doshi, T. D., &Pujar, M. S. 2015. Seismic Response of Vertical Irregular Structures with Soil-Structure Interaction. IUP Journal of Structural Engineering, 8(2), 7.
Davaran, A. 2001. Effective length factor for discontinuous X-bracing systems. Journal of engineering mechanics, 127(2), 106-112.
Davaran, A., &Hoveidae, N. 2009. Effect of mid-connection detail on the behavior of X-bracing systems. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(4), 985-990.
D’Aniello, M., La Manna Ambrosino, G., Portioli, F., &Landolfo, R. 2013. Modelling aspects of the seismic response of steel concentric braced frames. Steel and Composite Structures, An International Journal, 15(5), 539-66.
Desai, J. P., Jain, A. K., & Arya, A. S. 1988. Seismic response of RC braced frames. Computers & structures, 29(4), 557-568.
De Lima, L. R. O., da Silva, L. S., Vellasco, P. D. S., & De Andrade, S. A. L. 2004. Experimental evaluation of extended endplate beam-to-column joints subjected to bending and axial force. Engineering Structures, 26(10), 1333-1347.
DogramaciAksoylar, N., Elnashai, A. S., & Mahmoud, H. 2011. Seismic performance of semirigid moment-resisting frames under far and near field records. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138(2), 157-169.
Dillon, B.S., and Majid, A.M. 1989. International journal of structural  engineering. 3(1), 12-21. 
EC 8 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.
Abolmaali, A., Kukreti, A., Motahari, A., &Ghassemieh, M. 2009. Energy dissipation characteristics of semi-rigid connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(5), 1187-1197.
Al-Bermani, F. G. A., Li, B., Zhu, K., &Kitipornchai, S. 1994. Cyclic and seismic response of flexibly jointed frames. Engineering Structures, 16(4), 249-255.
Alderighi, E., & Salvatore, W. 2009. Structural fire performance of earthquake-resistant composite steel–concrete frames. Engineering Structures, 31(4), 894-909.
Al-Jabri, K. S., Burgess, I. W., Lennon, T., & Plank, R. J. 2005. Moment–rotation–temperature curves for semi-rigid joints. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61(3), 281-303.
Arbabi, F. 1982. Drift of flexibly connected frames. Computers & Structures, 15(2), 103-108.
Aristizabal-Ochoa, J. D. 2004. Timoshenko beam-column with generalized end conditions and nonclassical modes of vibration of shear beams. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130(10), 1151-1159.
Aristizabal-Ochoa, J. D. 2007. Large deflection and postbuckling behavior of Timoshenko beam–columns with semi-rigid connections including shear and axial effects. Engineering structures, 29(6), 991-1003.

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details