1. Katz JN, Harris MB (2008) Clinical practice: lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med
:,.358: 8 1 8-8 25. doi:10. 1 056/N EJ Mcp0708097
2. Sairyo K, Katoh S, Sasa T, Goel VK, Vadapalli S, Masuda A, Biyani A, Ebraheim
N: Athletes with unilateral spondylolysis are at risk of stress fracture at the contralateral
pedicle and pars interarticularis: A clinical and biomechanical study. American
Journal of Sports Medicine, in press
3. Lee CH, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ et al: Decompression Only Versus Fusion Surgery for
Lumbar Stenosis in Elderly Patients Over 75 Years Old: Which is Reasonable?
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2013.5a(3): 194-200
4. Truszczynska A, Rqpala K, Truszczynski O et al: Return to work after spinal
stenosis surgery and patients' quality of life. lnt J Occup Med Environ Health, 2013',
26(3):1-7
5. Postacchini F . The diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of clinical and
radiographic fi ndings in 43 cases . ltal J Orlhop Traumatol 1985 , 1 1 . 5 - 21 .
6. Tan SB . Spinal canal stenosis . Singapore Med J2003 ; 44 : 168-9 .
7. Epstein NE , Maldonado VC , Cusick JF . Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis .
Surg Neurol 1998 ; 50 : 3 - 10 .
8. Alvarez JA , Hardy RH Jr . Lumbar spine stenosis: a common cause of back and
leg pain . Am Fam Physician 1998 ; 57 : 1825 - 40 .
9. Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH, et al: An internal fixator for posterior
application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine: design
and testing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; (203): 75-98.
10. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C: lnternal fixation of the lumbar spine with
pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; (203):7-17.
11. Hur JW, Kim SH, Lee JW, Lee HK: Clinical analysis of postoperative outcome in
elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 41 : 157-160, 2007
12. Hanley EN Jr. The indications for lumbar spinal fusion with and without
instrumentation. Spine 1995; 20: 1435-53.
13. Kwon BK, Berta S, Daffner SD, et al. Radiographic analysis of transforaminal
lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal
Disord Tech 2003; 16:469-76.
14. Lowe TG, Tahernia AD. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody
fusion. Clin Orthop 2002; 394:64-72.
15. Whitecloud TS 3rd, Roesch \ 41y', Ricciardi JE. Transforaminal interbody fusion
versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J
Spinal Disord 2OO1; 14:100-3.
16. France JC, Yaszemski MJ, Lauerman WC, et al. A randomized prospective
study of posterolateral lumbar fusion: outcomes with and without pedicle screw
instrurnentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24:553-60.
17. Mdller H, Hedlund R. Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic
spondylolisthesis-a prospective randomized study: part 1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2000; 25.1711-5.
18. Fritzell P, Hdgg O, Wessberg P, et al. 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical
studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a
multicentre randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study group.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2QO1;26:2521-34.
19. Hallett A, Huntley JS, Gibson JN. Foraminal stenosis and single-level
degenerative disc disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing decompression
with decompression and instrumented fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2OO7;32:1375-
80
20. Lin PM. A technical modification of Cloward's posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 1977', 1.1 18-24.
21. Diedrich O, Luring C, Pennekamp PH, Perlick L, Wallny T, Kraft CN. Effect of
posterior lumbar interbody fusion on the lumbar sagittal spinal profile. Z Orthop lhre
G renzgeb. 2OO3; 1 4 1 (4) :425-32.
22. Cunningham BW, Polly DW Jr. The use of interbody cage devices for spinal
deformity: a biomechanical perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2OQ2;394:73-83.
23. Madan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus
posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"2002;
27:1526-42.
24. Hacker RJ. Comparison of interbody fusion approaches for disabling low back
pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22.660-5.
25. Rajendra Nath, Sanjay Middha, Anil Kumar Gupta, and Rohit Nath. Functional outcome of surgical management of degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. lndian J Orthop.
1 0.4103/00 1 9-54 1 3.96380 2012 May-Jun; 46(3): 285-290
26. Audat Z, Moutasem , Yousef K, Mohammad. comparison of clinical and
radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine. singapore M o r iginal A r t icle ed J 2012; 53(3): 183-63.
27. Zhao J, Zhang F, chen X, Yao y. posterior interbody fusion using a diagonal S" with unilateral transpedicular screw fixation for lumbar stenosis. Clin Neurosci. 2011 Mar;19(3).324-9.
28. Dong-Hee Kim, MD, soon-Taek Jeong, MD, sang-Soo Lee, MD., Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion using a Unilateral single cage and a Local Morselized Bone Graft in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine. Clinics in
Orthopedic Surgery 2009; 1 :21 4-221
29. D. Kok, M. Grevitt, F.H. wapstra and A.G. Veldhuizen. The open orthopaedics Journal, 2012, 6, 220-22s. The Memory Metal spinal system in a Posterior Lumbar lnterbody Fusion (PLIF) Procedure: A Prospective, Non-comparative study to Evaluate the safety and performance.
30. Atlas sJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB, chapin AM, patrick DL, Long JM, et al. The Maine Lumbar spine study, part lll. 1-year outcomes of surgical and, nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. spine (phila pa 1976). 1996 Aug 1;21(15):1787-94
31. Herron LD, Mangelsdorf C. Lumbar spinal stenosis: results of surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1991 Mar;a():26-33.
32. Ng LC, Sell P. Predictive value of the duration of sciatica for lumbar discectomy. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint surg Br. 2004 May;86(4):546- 9.