INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

( Online- ISSN 2454 -3195 ) New DOI : 10.32804/RJSET

Impact Factor* - 6.2311


**Need Help in Content editing, Data Analysis.

Research Gateway

Adv For Editing Content

   No of Download : 213    Submit Your Rating     Cite This   Download        Certificate

DECONTAMINATION OF ARSENIC BY PHYTOREMEDIATION TECNNIQUE

    2 Author(s):  RANDHIR KUMAR , TARUN KUMAR BANERJEE

Vol -  5, Issue- 2 ,         Page(s) : 142 - 151  (2015 ) DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/RJSET

Abstract

The present investigation deals with the decontamination of arsenic contaminated water using phytoremediation technique. Three macrophytes Azolla pinnata, Lemna minor and Hydrilla verticillata were exposed to 1.0 ppm of an arsenic salt (sodium arsenite) separately as well as in combination (mixed in equal proportion) of macrophytes (A:L:H) for 10 days. The concentration of arsenic in control (wild) macrophytes was below detectable limit. Following exposure the concentration of arsenic increased steadily in all the plants and after 10 days the efficacy of arsenic depletion in phytoremediated media was in the order: A. pinnata>Mixed plants (A: L: H)>L. minor>H. verticillata. It was found that A. pinnata detoxify the arsenic contaminated water most efficiently.

  1. Arnon DE (1949) Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplast, polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. J Plant.Physiol 24: 1–15
  2. Arvind P, Prasad MNV (2005) Cadmium-zinc interactions in a hydroponic system using Ceratophyllum demersum L.: Adaptive ecophysiology, biochemistry and molecular toxicology. Braz J Plant Physiol 17: 3–20
  3. Chakraborti D, Hussain A, Allauddin M (2003) Arsenic: Environmental and health  aspects with special reference to ground water in South Asia. J. Environ Sci Health Part A, Toxic Hazard Substance Environ Eng 38: 11-15
  4. Chowdhury TR, Basu GK, Mandal BK, Biswas BK, Samanta G, Chowdhury UK, Chanda CR, Lodh D, Roy SL, Saha  KC, Roy S, Kabir S, Quamruzzaman Q, Chakraborti D (1999) Arsenic poisoning in the Ganges delta. Nature 401:545–546
  5. Delgado M, Bigeriego M, Guardiola E (1993) Uptake of Zn, Cr and Cd by water hyacinths. Water Res 27: 269–272
  6. Khellaf N, Zerdaoui NM (2009) Growth response of the duckweed Lemna minor to heavy metals pollution. Iran J Environ Health Sci Eng  6: 161-166
  7. Matsui M, Nishigori C, Toyokuni S, Takada J, Akaboshi M, Ishikawa  M (1999) The role of oxidative DNA damage in human arsenic carcinogenesis: Detection of 8-hydroxy-2¢-deoxyguanosine in arsenic-related Bowen’s disease. J Invest Dermatol 113: 26–31.
  8. Mishra VK, Upadhyay AR, Pathak V, Tripathi  BD (2008)  Phytoremediation of mercury and arsenic from tropical opencast coalmine effluent through naturally occurring aquatic macrophytes. Water Air Soil Pollut 192: 303–314
  9. Rahman MJ, Hasegawa H (2011) Aquatic arsenic: phytoremediation using floating macrophytes. Chemosphere 83:633-646
  10. Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Mukherjee SC, Mondal BK, Paul K Lodh  D, Biswas BK, Chanda CR, Basu GK, Saha  KC,  Roy S, Das R, Palit  SK, Quamruzzaman  Q, Chakraborti D (2001) Chronic arsenic toxicity in Bangladesh and West Bengal, India--a review and commentary. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 39:683-700
  11. Robinson BH, Mills T.M,  Petit D, Fung  LE, Green SR, Clothier BE (2000) Natural and induced cadmium-accumulation in poplar and willow: Implications for phytoremediation. Plant Soil 227:301-306 
  12. Sharma  P,  Dubey RS  (2005) Lead toxicity in plants. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 17: 35-52
  13. Satyakala G, Jamil K (1992) Chromium induced biochemical changes in Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) solms and Pistia stratiotes. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 48: 921-92

*Contents are provided by Authors of articles. Please contact us if you having any query.






Bank Details